Customer service: Subscribe Now | Pay Bill | Place an Ad | Contact Us
divider Clarionledger.com divider Weather divider Jobs divider Cars divider Real Estate divider Apartments divider Shopping divider Classifieds divider Dating
ADVERTISEMENT

November 6, 2005

ADVERTISEMENT

Death penalty getting costly in Mississippi

  • Counties having to foot high bills for defense attorneys




    VICKSBURG — A killer who sets a house on fire to murder the family inside has a better chance of being tried, convicted and eventually executed if the crime is committed in De-Soto or Lee or Hinds counties in Mississippi than Humphreys or Leake or Wayne. The reason is simple: Money.

    Now more than ever, counties in this state have to weigh the cost when deciding whether they can afford to put a person on trial and ask a jury to return a death sentence. It's not the cost of prosecution; it's the cost of defense.

    Even wealthier counties, such as those named, would be hard-pressed to afford such cases. Counties without substantial tax bases simply could not do it.

    Residents of Quitman County know this. In July, the state Supreme Court reaffirmed its position that local governments, not the state, must pay lawyers for felony defendants who cannot afford private counsel.

    Quitman, population 10,500, had borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars to provide attorneys for two men accused of killing four members of a family in 1999. The county has sued, repeatedly, to try to get state money, but the court, with two justices dissenting, said, "Nope."

    Attorneys for the county said they may press the matter in federal courts, but for now that one criminal case has essentially bankrupted the Delta county.

    Why does a capital case cost so much?

    The answer entails a little history.

    The U.S. Constitution, in effect since 1789, and the Mississippi Constitution, in effect since 1890, both specifically say those accused of crimes have an absolute right to an attorney. A problem has been that the right was meaningless for those without money. By 1932, this was so troubling to the U.S. Supreme Court that justices said, in an Alabama case, having a defense lawyer was an "essential safeguard of liberty."

    At that time, they left it to the states to decide how to hire and fund defense counsel for the poor. The states did nothing.

    But the issue kept coming up again and again, and in a 1963 case involving a Florida burglar, the Supreme Court said, "That's that." From that day on, an accused person who couldn't afford representation had a right to an attorney whose fee would be paid from the public treasury.

    On a parallel track through the same years, and as recently as 2004, the Supreme Court has been raising the hurdles states must clear before a condemned person can be put to death.

    But more than anything else, the Supreme Court has insisted that when it comes to death penalty cases, court-appointed defense attorneys must show a high level of competence.

    It's on this point where Mississippi, much to the joy of those who oppose capital punishment, has simply not stepped up.

    The statistics prove it. Since 1976, when the Supreme Court lifted a moratorium on all executions, Texas has the record: 351 people put to death. Across the South, the numbers are Louisiana, 27; Arkansas, 26; Alabama, 34; Georgia, 39; Florida, 60 — and Mississippi, 6. (Rates of homicides per 100,000 residents are fairly even across the seven states, except Louisiana where murders are double the average.)

    What those other states have done and Mississippi has not is make a big investment of public funds in defending people accused of capital crimes. It may seem strange, but a state that really wants felons to pay the maximum penalty must make sure those accused have nothing but the best in terms of their legal team.

    This is not theory, it's fact; and legislators who follow such matters are thoroughly aware of why more capital felons here don't suffer the fate they would in neighboring states.

    Fewer and fewer district attorneys will choose to subject their local taxpayers to the cost of prosecutions where the death penalty is an option for jurors. Can't afford it.

    Many have pleaded loud and long for an end to all capital punishment in America. They hoped to win on principle. Instead, they're winning on cost.


    Charlie Mitchell is executive editor of The Vicksburg Post. Write to him at P.O. Box 821668, Vicksburg MS 39182, or e-mail post@vicksburg.com.

  • forum Join our forums. | Subscribe to the Clarion-Ledger Subscribe to The Clarion-Ledger.
    Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service
    and Privacy Policy, updated June 7, 2005.
           

    ADVERTISEMENTS